kabonfootprint - My question above was very basic why we school? The matter above definitely more in why we went to school in the meaning and the Context to could read wrote in order to develop the life of the nation or go to school to as the prestige completely that in mentioned the intellectuals? That is basic Education until the tertiary institution. There were several matters that made me concerned with the Condition that in faced All Of Us as the insignificant part the Indonesian nation. This matter that awakened me to realise only did not emphasise the Business only.

If being observed thoroughly, the idea of compulsory education was an absurdity or the contradiction. Firstly, the studying process was not possible to have gone effective if having a forcing to himself . The idea student centeredness or education that concentrated on the student always put forward and required studying realized as well as was responsible for the studying process that was undergone by him. This was based on the principle that urging or the wish to learn from itself was the main element in the studying process. Despite that, the process studied that was forced will never sustained or remained.

Secondly, compulsory education apparently was confused in an obligatory manner went to school. Obligatory went to school indeed was easy very much observed him. A student or the student who did not go to the school at the time of the clear school hour violated obligatory went to school. Very clear and was easy to determine someone against obligatory went or not to school. However, how with compulsory education? To the other side, we must record that someone who went to school still could not be interpreted was studying

If learning to be an obligation, the indicator what was decisive someone careless studied or not? How also the implementation operation of his observation later? Really was difficult measured whether someone was studying? A child who was playing in the paddy-field dyke or the bank the coast looked for the fish whether was being did not study? A child who helped his mother to sell in the market whether was being did not study? Someone the child was 10 years that were daydreaming under the tree to river outskirts old in struck 08,00, for example, was violating his studying obligation? Indeed, the school obligation was possibly violated by him, but the obligation studied? If he was asked, he possibly replied that he was learning to think. then, how also we could deny him? Very confused very confused very fought to decision maker in the world of education.